2015 Payday Loan Statistics for California

Editor’s note: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is finalizing new rules for payday, car title, and high-cost installment loans. They want to hear from YOU about your experiences and recommendations for the loans. Please take two minutes to provide your insights here. 

California Payday Lending Statistics

1) Total Number of loans:  Approximately 12.3 million loans were made in California in 2015 and the aggregate dollar amount of the loans was about $4.2 billion.

2) Average number of loans and average APRs: The average number of loans per customer was 6.5, paying an average APR of 366% (average APR increased 5% from 2014).[1]

3) Repeat borrowers and “churning” of loans: Contrary to loans being advertised as a “one time fix for emergencies” the number of Californians who obtained 10 payday loans (462,334) was far greater than the number who only had one loan (323,870). Subsequent transactions by the same borrower accounted for 76% of the total number of loans made in 2015 with 47% of subsequent loans made the same day a previous loan transaction was paid off and another 23% happening within 1-7 days.

CA DBO new report number of transactions

Graph is from CA Dept. of Business Oversight Report on 2015 Payday Lending Statistics

4) Churning profits: 64% of fees in 2015 ($53.53 million) – came from customers who had seven or more transactions during the year.

Fees collected

Graph is from CA Dept. of Business Oversight Report on 2015 Payday Lending Statistics 

5) Repossessions: 16,989 car title loans resulted in the consumer’s car being repossessed in 2015.[2] At the national level, the CFPB has found that 1 in 5 car title loans ultimately results in a repossession.[3]

6) Fees: California payday loan consumers pay over $507 million annually in payday loans and over $239 million in car title loans.  This ranks California in the #2 spot for highest amount of fees paid for car title and payday loans.[4]

7 Economic drain: Payday lending is an estimated $135 million net drain on California’s economy every year and subtracts 1,975 jobs.[5]

Customers age

Graph is from CA Dept. of Business Oversight Report on 2015 Payday Lending Statistics on ages 

The California Reinvestment Coalition builds an inclusive and fair economy that meets the needs of communities of color and low-income communities by ensuring that banks and other corporations invest and conduct business in our communities in a just and equitable manner.

You might also be interested in these payday lending posts:

Editorials Against Payday Lenders (As of July 2016, there’s been more than 150 editorials written from around the country about the financial harm caused by these lenders).

Payday Lender Hall of Shame This industry is known for spectacularly shady practices against its consumers. We’ve compiled some of the worst.

8 Reasons Not to Get An Online Payday Loan Is that really a lender’s website you’re on?  Or is it a broker who will re-sell your sensitive information repeatedly?

Data Sources:

[1] CA Dept. of Business Oversight press release, available at: http://www.dbo.ca.gov/Press/press_releases/2016/2016%20CDDTL%20Annual%20Report%20and%20Industry%20Survey%20Press%20Release%2007-06-16.pdf

[2] CA Dept. of Business Oversight 2015 CFLL annual report, available at: http://www.dbo.ca.gov/Licensees/Finance_Lenders/pdf/2015_CFLL_Aggregated_Annual_Report_FINAL.pdf

[3] Consumer Financial Protection Bureau press release, available at: http://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/cfpb-finds-one-five-auto-title-loan-borrowers-have-vehicle-seized-failing-repay-debt/

[4] Center for Responsible Lending report, available at: http://responsiblelending.org/sites/default/files/nodes/files/research-publication/crl_statebystate_fee_drain_may2016_0.pdf

[5] Insight Center for Community Economic Development report, available at: http://ww1.insightcced.org/uploads/assets/Net%20Economic%20Impact%20of%20Payday%20Lending.pdf

Compilation of Payday Loan Legal Settlements

Editor’s note: The CFPB, a federal agency, has proposed new rules for payday, car title, and high-cost installment lenders.

 

BUT, they need to hear from consumers- that means you! We have an easy-to-use page where you can weigh in- it only takes a minute and will help bring about important consumer protections with these loans. Please share a line or two in the comments box about why you care about this issue and want to see strong federal reforms.
PS: You do NOT have to be a payday, car title, or installment borrower to sign the petition.

 

CRC is starting to compile payday loan settlements- if we’ve missed any, please send them to us: SCOFFEY AT CALREINVEST.ORG and we’ll post em here.  And, Advance America has its own post about all their settlements. You can read it here:  ADVANCE AMERICA PAYDAY LENDER SETTLEMENTS

State bars internet lender, wins $11.7M settlement over ‘rent-a-tribe’ loans
CashCall Inc., an internet lender accused of hiding behind an American Indian tribe to break state laws, agreed to pay nearly $12 million to settle charges filed by Minnesota’s attorney general.The company, based in California, was also barred from further business in the state, Attorney General Lori Swanson said Thursday. “The company engaged in an elaborate scheme to collect payments far higher than allowed by state law,” Swanson said in announcing the settlement. CashCall must cancel all outstanding loans, pay back consumers and “undo any adverse reporting to the credit bureaus.” August 18, 2016.

Arkansas AG Settles Payday Lending Lawsuit for $750,000  One of the defendants, a South Dakota based company, identified itself as a tribal entity with sovereign immunity. The company, however, was neither owned nor operated by a tribe. The complaint alleged that the South Dakota lender entered an agreement with a California-based company, pursuant to which it would originate payday loans before assigning them to the California company to collect. July 9, 2016.

Courthouse News Service:  $1.6 Million Settlement With Payday Lenders: Nebraska will accept $1.6 million to settle a predatory lending suit against CashCall and Western Sky Financial, which it accused of falsely claiming tribal affiliation to duck lending laws. (May 6, 2016).

Times Free  Press: Chattanooga payday king justified illegal business by giving money to charity  (May 18, 2016)  A used car salesman turned tech entrepreneur who operated an illegal payday lending syndicate from Chattanooga will pay $9 million in fines and restitution, as well as serve 250 hours of community service and three years of probation, after pleading guilty to felony usury in New York. Carey Vaughn Brown, 57, admitted to New York prosecutors that he broke the law from 2001 to 2013 by lending millions of dollars — $50 million to New Yorkers in 2012 alone — with interest rates well in excess of the state’s 25 percent annual percentage rate cap.

New York Touts $3M Payday Loan Settlement:  (May 18, 2016). In its first such action, New York’s top financial watchdog reached a $3 million settlement Wednesday with two debt-buying companies that improperly bought and collected on illegal payday loans.

Vermont AG Enters Largest Settlement With Online Payday Loan Processor  (May 24, 2016)  In the settlement agreement, the company admitted that it processed electronic financial transactions on behalf of approximately 43 separate lenders, in connection with high-interest, small-dollar consumer loans made over the internet. None of those lenders were licensed to make loans in Vermont. Between 2012-2014, however, the company processed approximately $1.7 million in transfers from Vermont residents’ bank accounts.

Payday lender will pay $10 million to settle consumer bureau’s claims  (July 10, 2014) “Ace used false threats, intimidation and harassing calls to bully payday borrowers into a cycle of debt,” bureau Director Richard Cordray said. “This culture of coercion drained millions of dollars from cash-strapped consumers who had few options to fight back.”

California Payday Lending Statistics

Editor’s note: The CFPB, a federal agency, has proposed new rules for payday, car title, and high-cost installment lenders.

BUT, they need to hear from consumers- that means you! We have an easy-to-use page where you can weigh in- it only takes a minute and will help bring about important consumer protections with these loans. Please share a line or two in the comments box about why you care about this issue and want to see strong federal reforms.

PS: You do NOT have to be a payday, car title, or installment borrower to sign the petition.

payday lender vultures

Payday and Car Title Lending Statistics

Payday Lending is a $135 million net drain on California’s economy each year: Despite industry claims about creating jobs, a 2013 report from the Insight Center for Community Development estimates the payday lending industry subtracts 1,975 jobs from California’s economy each year, and is a net loss to the state economy of over $135 million annually.

Nationally, four out of five payday loans are rolled over or renewed: Countering industry claims about payday loans as being useful for “one-time emergencies,” a study by the CFPB found that 4 out of 5 payday loans are rolled over or renewed within two weeks, adding to concerns about the high-cost “debt traps” created by these loans.

California consumers pay over $507 million in payday loan fees annually and $239 million in car title fees: A new report from the Center for Responsible Lending finds that consumers pay $239,339,250 in fees for car title loans and $507,873,939 in payday loan fees, ranking California as the #2 state for highest amount of fees paid for car title and payday loans.

More than 15,591 Californians had cars repossessed in 2014 because of car title loans: According to the California Department of Business Oversight, the charge-off rate for auto title loans in 2014 was 4.5 percent. (17,633 of 394,510).  At the national level, recent research from the CFPB found that 1 in 5 car title borrowers will have their car repossessed.

Do these facts concern you?  There is a KEY opportunity to weigh in with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as it finalizes rules to regulate payday, car title, and installment lenders. Please share your stories and comments here: CFPB comment.

Learn more about payday lending by visiting CRC’s website.

California Payday Loan Consumers Share their Experiences

Editor’s note: The CFPB, a federal agency, has proposed new rules for payday, car title, and high-cost installment lenders.

BUT, they need to hear from consumers- that means you! We have an easy-to-use page where you can weigh in- it only takes a minute and will help bring about important consumer protections with these loans. Please share a line or two in the comments box about why you care about this issue and want to see strong federal reforms.

PS: You do NOT have to be a payday, car title, or installment borrower to sign the petition.

IMG_4842

How do California consumers who have used payday loans feel about them?

These are just a few of the many stories we’ve heard from consumers who have shared their stories with CRC:

1. MN from San Bruno, CA: “I am currently fighting online payday loans as we speak. I got in to a bind and had to borrow to make sure my daughter and I continued to have a roof over our head. These lenders take money on different days than what was agreed upon and don’t tell you all the fees that they will be adding into on top of the interest. I have one company that I can’t even access my “contract” and they never sent me a copy. If the vicious cycle doesn’t stop the best recourse people in this cycle will have is to file bankruptcy.”

2.  JF from Fresno, CA: “About two years ago I used a payday loan to assist with monthly expenses. I thought it would be easy to pay off but then I noticed I could not afford to pay the loan without securing another! The lenders provide little to no other option to pay back the loan which lets you know they aren’t concerned with helping you get through the hard spot they are more concerned with keeping you in the endless cycle to pad their pockets! Payday loans are BAD business!!!”

 3. SF from Oakland, CA: “In 2006 I was working full-time but when my boyfriend moved out I had to pay the entire rent myself and had trouble making ends meet. I started to use the payday loans and soon found myself in an endless cycle of debt, having to pay off two or more in cash every two weeks in order to get two more to cover my bills. The loan rates were outrageous and some of these franchises require you pay in cash instead of depositing your personal check. It took me a couple of years to get out of this cycle of debt and it kills me to think of all the money I lost on fees over those years. I will never use those services again. These companies are absolutely predatory and should be fully regulated and restricted since they profit from the people who can least spare the financial fleecing. Thank you.

4. JJ from Lamont, CA: No work, needed money to keep afloat and the lender made it to easy to get loan, a car title loan and it has been a nightmare, do yourself a big favor don’t ever get a title loan !

5. M from San Diego, CA: I have been caught up in payday loan for over a year now it’s taking all of my money and I don’t know how to get out help.

6. DD from Los Angeles: “I was in a difficult financial time in my business and needed a $2500 loan to cover my rent that was due. I had exhausted all my other options and wasn’t expecting any checks for a few weeks. I own my car and decided to go to Loanmart to get a loan. I called them up, told them what I needed and what kind of car they had. They approved me for $3000, even though I asked them for only $2500. Considering I was desperate for money, I went ahead with it, not knowing about the interest cap over $2500. Which I am sure they were well aware of and is why they urged me to get a higher loan.

So, after 2 years of paying, I have now given them over $4500, that’s $1500 more than the original loan. They say I still owe them $3000. For a total of $7500 due on a $3000 loan. Its highway robbery. These people are awful, they harass me all the time, lie to me about payment due dates and even on one occasion sent me to collections on a missed payment even though I had already paid it for that month from their 3rd party payment site (moneygram). I went and checked and the payment never went through. Which is very suspicious.

Now they are threatening to repo my vehicle. I don’t know what to do, this whole experience has been horrible. I am self employed and struggle enough getting by. I hope someone can sue them for these shady business practices. I will be more than happy to testify against them.”

 

Would Postal Banking Be Better than Payday Loans?

Editor’s note: The CFPB, a federal agency, has proposed new rules for payday, car title, and high-cost installment lenders.

BUT, they need to hear from consumers- that means you! We have an easy-to-use page where you can weigh in- it only takes a minute and will help bring about important consumer protections with these loans. Please share a line or two in the comments box about why you care about this issue and want to see strong federal reforms.

PS: You do NOT have to be a payday, car title, or installment borrower to sign the petition.

 

Earlier this week, Liana Molina, director of community engagement at the California Reinvestment Coalition, testified at a field hearing held by the Grand Alliance to Save Our Public Postal Service.  The alliance is focused on  “the choice now facing the U.S. Postal Service: Build on the heritage of universal, nationwide service and expand to meet the needs of the hi-tech economy and low-income communities – or continue to shrink with declining service, facility closings and job cuts.”

USPS picture

Molina’s testimony focused on a proposal for the USPS to complete with fringe, predatory payday, car title, and other high cost lenders by instead offering safe, low-cost financial services.  Her testimony is included below.

Good evening, my name is Liana Molina. I’m the Director of Community Engagement at the California Reinvestment Coalition (CRC). The California Reinvestment Coalition is a statewide, membership based organization working to build a fair and inclusive economy that meets the needs of communities of color, low-income communities, and others who have been marginalized and historically underserved.  We use strategic advocacy that leads banks and other corporations to provide investments and financial services that expand access to housing that is affordable, entrepreneurial opportunities, good jobs, and other tools to create and sustain household and community wealth.

Historically CRC has advocated for greater transparency and accountability of the banking industry, and we’ve pushed banks to grow and strengthen their community reinvestment lending, services and investments in low-income communities across California. Today we continue our work to expand access to fair and affordable banking, credit and other financial services and opportunities for underserved consumers.

I lead CRC’s Stop the Debt Trap campaign to reform high-cost payday, car title and installment lending practices. We are employing a multi-pronged approach that entails legislative and regulatory advocacy at the local, state and federal level. Before I delve into the specific policy reforms we are seeking and how the US Postal Service can play an important and impactful role in the struggle against predatory lending, let me share why we got involved in the fight to end predatory payday lending.

Our efforts against predatory payday lending stem from our work to change and improve the mainstream banking sector.

Did you know that every single payday loan borrower is also a bank customer? A consumer needs to have an active checking account in order to obtain a payday loan, since the loan is secured with a post-dated check which is then deposited by the lender on the consumer’s next pay date.

So these consumers are not entirely unbanked. These are people who likely use their bank accounts for direct deposit of their income and to handle other basic financial transactions, such as paying regular bills. Yet, these consumers cannot borrow a $300 or $500 loan from their bank because the banks do not make small dollar loans that meet the credit needs of their clients. So this is one way the banks are part of the problem.

Additionally, many of the big banks are actually invested in payday loan corporations through extending lines of credit they provide to payday lenders, which enable payday lenders to conduct their business. So while the banks aren’t making affordable small dollar loans directly to their customers, they have major credit agreements with payday lenders who then charge these same customers triple-digit interest rates on short-term loans. Banks involved in financing high-cost, low-quality lending through lines of credit and term loans to payday loan corporations include Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, US Bank and others.

Finally, CRC has prioritized our Stop the Debt Trap campaign to end predatory consumer lending because when we talk about the provision of financial services in low-income communities, many economically disadvantaged neighborhoods do not have access to full service bank branches. Instead, these neighborhoods are saturated with fringe financial entities such as check cashers, pawn shops and payday loan outlets, all of which strip the income and assets of consumers struggling to make ends meet. We also know that payday loan stores are more likely to be located in African-American and Latino neighborhoods than in white neighborhoods.

Given this landscape, there is room for a lot of improvement in how our financial system meets the credit and capital needs of low and moderate-income consumers. While CRC agrees that there is a legitimate need for access to credit, debt trap products like payday, car title and installment loans (which are basically payday loans on steroids) do not help people over the long-term.

Payday Lenders

In California, the interest rate on a two-week, $300 payday loan is 459% APR. It amounts to $15 per $100, or $45 to borrow $255. It may not seem so bad at the face value, and most consumers can afford to pay $45 for a $255 loan. However, payday loans require a balloon payment of the full $300 at the borrower’s next pay date, two-weeks later. Most borrowers do not have $300 to pay off the debt without having to re-borrow. So unless the borrower has an increase in their income or a decrease in their expenses, in 4 out of 5 cases, they will take out another loan in order to meet their basic expenses for the next two weeks. This cycle repeats itself an average of 7-10 times for consumers, and drains Californians of over $578 million in interest and fees, annually.

High-cost car title and installment lending is growing in California. Now that the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is poised to issue rules on payday lending, more payday lenders are moving into these other loan products that are just as dangerous. Our state doesn’t regulate the interest rates on payday loans below $300 or on consumer loans above $2,500. We are seeing more car title loans at interest rates at around 100% APR and longer-term installment loans with interest rates at 200% or higher. For example, one borrower working with us on the campaign paid $6,700 over 24 months for a $2,529 car title loan at 112.47%. It’s outrageous.

CRC and other consumer groups have been advocating for changes to local and state laws to rein in these predatory lending practices for many years, and it has been an uphill battle. One of our greatest challenges is the lack of wide-scale alternatives available on the market. Many of our policy makers accept predatory lending as a necessary evil, because they claim that their constituents need access to these loans, and the banks are not lending.

Do you see where I’m going with this?

This is where the concept of postal banking could really make a tangible difference in providing an accessible, responsible, affordable alternative loan product to consumers. The US Postal Service already provides some financial services, such as money orders, cashing of treasury checks, international paper and electronic money orders and gift cards. There is tremendous potential to expand the products and services offered by the USPS to meet the financial needs of underserved populations. We recognize that moving the postal service into offering consumer loans is a long-term process, not an immediate step. However, given the huge demand for small dollar consumer loans, it is a vision that is worth working toward.

When CRC learned about the Campaign for Postal Banking, we were excited to learn that a national coalition has come together to advocate for the USPS to act immediately to expand and enhance existing products and services. While the creation of small dollar lending and savings programs would necessitate Congressional legislation, the USPS could begin to build on the financial products and services currently offered. For example, the postal service could start cashing payroll checks, it could install surcharge-free ATMs in post office lobbies to enable recipients of public benefits to access their funds without paying fees, and it could introduce bill payment and electronic fund transfer services.

By providing less expensive financial products and services, the USPS could help improve the financial stability of millions of Californians. A postal banking system would not only benefit consumers who do not have access to mainstream financial institutions, it would also provide a sorely needed alternative to the big banks who wrecked our economy with predatory mortgage lending and then exploited tax payers by receiving trillion dollar bailouts.

We know that a public banking option is possible. The United States had a Postal Savings System from 1911-1967, which at its peak held about 10 percent of assets in the entire commercial banking system. Today, 1.5 billion people worldwide receive some financial services through their postal service in countries like the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Japan. Posts around the world have demonstrated the feasibility of successfully providing financial services, increasing financial inclusion and generating revenue for the postal service.

We believe this is possible in the United States, and it will require our persistent advocacy and campaigning to bring about these types of changes. CRC is optimistic about the current dialogue around postal banking, and we look forward to participating in local, regional and statewide efforts to move this conversation forward. We greatly appreciate the work of A Grand Alliance to Save Our Public Postal Service and the Campaign for Postal Banking.

Thank you for the opportunity to testify.

 

Advance America Payday Lender Settlements

Editor’s note: The CFPB, a federal agency, has proposed new rules for payday, car title, and high-cost installment lenders.

BUT, they need to hear from consumers- that means you! We have an easy-to-use page where you can weigh in- it only takes a minute and will help bring about important consumer protections with these loans. Please share a line or two in the comments box about why you care about this issue and want to see strong federal reforms.

PS: You do NOT have to be a payday, car title, or installment borrower to sign the petition.

 

As the payday, car title, and installment loan industry is trying to fight the upcoming CFPB regulations, one of the claims they try to make is that store-front locations offering loans are far more legitimate and far less likely to take advantage of customers as compared to online lenders. We’ll agree that online lenders are also shady (read our post here:  8 Reasons Not to Get an Online Payday Loan)

Let’s examine this claim that storefront lenders are less shady.  First, it’s impossible to ignore the predatory rates they charge their customers, and the fact that 4 out of 5 of their customers are forced to renew their loans because the loan repayment terms are unrealistic.  These loans are allowed to be offered this way in many states because the industry has been so prolific at bribing…er…investing…er….making campaign contributions to state legislators who write the rules.  And, the industry has a well-documented history of using questionable smear tactics to defeat state legislation that would better protect consumers.

Put aside their bad products that are legal but predatory, and let’s move onto the claim that all storefront payday lenders follow the rules.  It turns out, that’s not the case either.  In fact, some car title, and instalmment lenders also don’t follow state laws, and as a result, are forced to settle with regulators and with attorneys who sue them.

In our first edition of “Payday Lender Law Breakers,” we’ll take a look at Advance America and its checkered history of settlements.

Shark payday 2

 There’s been a lot of them, so if we missed one, let us know in the comments section!

2015: State of Pennsylvania $22 million settlement: According to Lancaster Online, under this settlement, Advance America will pay $8 million in restitution, forgive unpaid balances of about $12 million, and pay another $2 million to the state for legal costs in administering the settlement.  Read more here: Payday lender Advance America to return $8M to Pa. consumers in settlement

2010: Missouri: Advance America agrees to settlement worth at least $5.8 million in cash and debt forgiveness to a class of Missouri residents.  Read more here: Payday Lender To Shell Out $6M In Class Settlement

2010: North Carolina: Advance American agrees to $18 million settlement in North Carolina: Read more here: Payday Loan Lawsuit Brings $18 Million Settlement Against Advance America

2010: South Carolina: Advance America part of $2.5 million lawsuit in South Carolina against payday lenders. Read more here: Payday Loan Class Action Settlement

2009 California: State of California Dept. of Business Oversight Settlement: In 2008 the Department conducted regulatory examinations of various Advance
America locations.  The examinations cited purported violations of the CDDTL, including that Advance America allegedly collected excess amounts from customers that made partial payments on their loans, allegedly collected NSF fees on returned checks that were deposited after customers made partial payments on their loans, allegedly failed to refund finance charges to customers that paid off their loans the next business day following origination, and allegedly conducted deferred deposit transactions at an unlicensed location (hereinafter collectively “Exam Findings”). Advance America disputes and denies the Exam Findings.  Read more here: State of California Settlement Agreement and Desist and Refrain Order

2009: Georgia Settlement: Press release: Advance America Announces Settlement in Georgia and the Closing of 24 Centers in New Hampshire

2009 Arkansas Settlement: Read more here:  http://www.stoppaydaypredators…

 

CRC resources on predatory payday, car title, and installment lending

Share Your Story about payday, high cost installment, or car title lending- It only takes 3-5 minutes. By sharing your experience, you can help take a stand against predatory lending and help the CFPB understand why consumers need strong rules to limit predatory loans.

Editorials Against Payday Lending Newspapers around the country are weighing in!  Check out this extensive compilation of 109 editorials (and counting!) against the debt traps created by payday and other high cost loans:

Payday Lender Hall of Shame: If you thought payday lenders are here to help, read this shocking expose of their worst practices.  Some truly shocking behavior!

North American Title Loans Repossess Car from Injured Consumer.  Watch this PBS NewsHour segment about TJ McLaughlin, whose car was repossessed after he couldn’t make payments because of a health problem.

Advocates bite back at payday lenders for “Shark Week” action

Editor’s note: The CFPB, a federal agency, has proposed new rules for payday, car title, and high-cost installment lenders.

BUT, they need to hear from consumers- that means you! We have an easy-to-use page where you can weigh in- it only takes a minute and will help bring about important consumer protections with these loans. Please share a line or two in the comments box about why you care about this issue and want to see strong federal reforms.

PS: You do NOT have to be a payday, car title, or installment borrower to sign the petition.

 

Payday Loan Shark Attack!

Payday Loan Shark Attack!

Consumers, youth leaders and advocates staged a demonstration at a Check ‘N Go storefront in downtown San Francisco today to raise awareness about a unique breed of sharks – financial predators offering payday loans – as part of the Discovery Channel’s “Shark Week.”

Check out the coverage on Univision: Evite préstamos imposibles de pagar, ¿cómo evitar los préstamos del día de pago?

And on CBS San Francisco: Rally In San Francisco Calls Attention To Predatory Payday Lenders

During Conference

The CFPB will begin writing payday loan rules in early 2015, and advocates are urging the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to implement strong consumer protection rules to end the payday loan debt trap. Research indicates most payday loan consumers end up in long-term debt after taking out their first payday loan, typically using 10 payday loans a year. Consumers who have struggled with payday loan debt or who have been harassed by payday loan collectors are encouraged to file complaints and share their stories with the CFPB via their website: www.consumerfinance.gov.

Group Picture Final

Community groups have been campaigning for local and statewide reforms for over a decade, resulting in numerous California cities adopting restrictive land use measures to restrict the growth of payday loan stores. Despite local leaders taking action, the California state legislature has failed to enact any consumer protections.

CRC payday organizer Liana Molina

Liana Molina from CRC

“Our state Senate and Assembly have repeatedly rejected payday loan reform proposals that would rein in payday loan abuses,” explains Liana Molina, an organizer with the California Reinvestment Coalition. “People think these loans will help them stretch their paychecks.  Instead, they find themselves in an endless cycle of renewing their original loans and paying hundreds of dollars in fees as a result.”

Michael Hampton

Michael Hampton, leader of Community Housing Partnership’s Community Organizing Resident Engagement program

“We’re calling on the payday loan industry to end their attacks against working people, and for the CFPB to do what our state has failed to do: end the debt trap,” says Michael Hampton, a leader of Community Housing Partnership’s Community Organizing Resident Engagement program.

Graciela Aponte

Graciela Aponte with the Center for Responsible Lending, California

Graciela Aponte of the Center for Responsible Lending and Fernando Aguilar of the Youth Leadership Institute also spoke to the crowd about the issue and what communities can do to fight back against the payday loan industry.

Fernando

Fernando Aguilar of the Youth Leadership Institute

CRC was proud to work with Community Housing Partnership’s Community Organizing Resident Engagement (CORE) tenant leaders, Youth Leadership Institute (YLI) and Mission SF Community Financial Center youth leaders, the Tenderloin Housing Clinic, the Housing Rights Committee of SF and the Center for Responsible Lending California to organize this action. Similar events are taking place across the country this week, coordinated by National People’s Action.

Payday loan shark attack

William “Bill” Gandy

Are you angry about payday loans and the financial damage they cause?  Sign our petition to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Tell the CFPB: Payday Loans Must Include Consumer Protections

Also, check out John Oliver and Sarah Silverman’s take on payday loans: John Oliver Last Night.  (Some adult language)

Pressed for time?  Check out Consumerist, where they pulled out the five best lines from this episode: The Best Lines From John Oliver’s Takedown Of The Payday Loan Industry